| << Back to our design articles | |
|
Many brands of that era, such as Uncle Ben's rice and Kellogg's breakfast cereal furnish illustrations of the problem. The manufacturers wanted their products to appear and feel as familiar as the local farmers' produce. From there, with the help of advertising, manufacturers quickly learned to associate other kinds of brand values, such as youthfulness, fun or luxury, with their products. This kick started the practice we now know as "branding".
But that is still recent history -- relatively. Between the 1600s and 1800s, criminals were branded (again literally) as a form of punishment and identification. For instance, in England, they branded an S on a person's cheek, while in France, they branded a fleur de lis on the shoulder. As repugnant as it may be to us today, slaves were also branded roughly during the same time period to connote ownership. In the 1200s, England required bread makers, goldsmiths and silversmiths to put their marks on goods, primarily to insure honesty in measurement. In the Medieval times, printers also used marks as did paper makers (watermarks) and various other craft guilds. But branding goes back even further. As far back as 1300 BC, potter's marks were used on pottery and porcelain in China, Greece, Rome and India. Branding of cattle and livestock go back as far as 2000 BC. And archaeologists have found evidence of advertising among Babylonians dating back to 3000 BC. So, how far back does branding go? At least 5000 years. What is
more interesting to me are underlying needs from which
branding originated: to insure honesty, provide quality
assurance, identify source or ownership, hold producers
responsible, differentiate, as a form of identification and
to create emotional bonding. Interestingly, people value
brands for many of the same reasons today. Clearly, history
provides some insight and perspective on modern day
branding. |
|
|
|
|



Brands in the field of
marketing originated in the 19th century with the advent of
packaged goods. Industrialization moved the production of many
household items, such as soap, from local communities to
centralized factories. These factories, generating
mass-produced goods, needed to sell their products in a wider
market, to a customer base familiar only with local goods. It
quickly became apparent that a generic package of soap had
difficulty competing with familiar, local products. The
packaged goods manufacturers needed to convince the market
that the public could place just as much trust in the
non-local product.

